Thursday, 31 May 2012

Gallery: 29 Photo Challenge Winners. Plus: Fujifilm X-Pro1 Tested

PopPhoto
May 31, 2012
Breaking news from America's top photo magazines
PopPhotoAmerica Photo
Every month we challenge our readers to show us great work. You always deliver
Our Photo Challenge has been going strong for many months now. The topics have have varied almost as much as the creative entries we've received. We thought this would be a good time to take a look back at past winners. The resulting gallery is as educational as it is beautiful.

Cutting-edge digital outfitted in vintage rangefinder style
Cycling specialist Michael Crook captures racing life
For $200, you'll be able to put M-Mount glass on your X-Pro1


facebook
 Be the first to hear about new stuff on PopPhoto.com by subscribing to our revamped RSS feed!
TECH SUPPORT
Smalles Is Not Best

Lenses are almost always sharpest at intermediate apertures, not the smallest. This runs counter to intuition: Since small apertures provide greater depth of field, you might think they’d provide maximum sharpness. Not so. Without getting into the science, the smallest apertures tend to degrade images. There may be more depth in the image, but if you blow up the area you focused on, you’ll almost always find it somewhat softer at small apertures than at larger ones.

Photographers who want maximum sharpness in images will avoid smaller apertures for this reason. An old rule of thumb is that lenses tend to be sharpest at an aperture 2 to 3 stops down from maximum. On an f/2.8 lens, this would be f/5.6 to f/8.



From: 12 Things You Didn't Know Your DSLR Could Do



 
More from PopPhoto.com:
Become a fan of PopPhoto.com on Facebook
Follow PopPhoto.com on Twitter
 

Change your preferences | Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Forward this email
Add newsletter@email.popphoto.com to your address book to ensure our emails reach your inbox.
Copyright © Bonnier Corporation, 460 N. Orlando Ave., Suite 200, Winter Park, FL 32789

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are those of the sponsors and are not an endorsement nor do they reflect the opinions of Bonnier Corporation or any of its publications.

No comments:

Post a Comment