Thursday, 8 September 2011

9/11: The Photographers' Stories

PopPhoto
September 08, 2011
Breaking news from America's top photo magazines
PopPhotoAmerica Photo
Part one of our four-part expanded oral history of September 11, 2001, told by the photographers who documented it

On a bright, clear morning in September, 2001, American Airlines Flight 11 was commandeered by terrorists and steered into the North Tower of Manhattan’s World Trade Center. The initial impact occurred at 8:46 a.m. Within minutes, photographers were making their way toward Manhattan’s financial district. With only a dim notion of what was going on, they pushed past throngs of escaping workers and into the annals of history.

READ MORE >>

A second plane crashes, chaos blooms, photographers press closer
Towers crumble, priorities shift, the world changes in an instant
Photogs dust off, shed tears, evade checkpoints and make pictures


facebook
 Be the first to hear about new stuff on PopPhoto.com by subscribing to our revamped RSS feed!
TECH SUPPORT
SuperDuper Macro
Q. Canon claims a 1:5 maximum subject magnification for its 65mm f/2.8 MP-E Macro lens, while Sigma states 1:1 for its 70mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro. Given that they both focus to approximately the same minimum distance, wouldn’t they both achieve essentially the same magnification?

A. The two don’t actually have the same close-focusing distance. Sigma measures this distance from the front element, while Canon uses the standard methodology, which is to measure distance from the focal plane.

But there is another issue here that has confused a fair number of our readers: the MP-E Canon’s maximum magnification ratio is 5:1, not 1:5. That means five times life size: an object 1/5 of an inch long would project an image of 1 inch on the film or sensor. That’s macro! Canon isn’t exaggerating by much when it states, “you can fill a 35mm frame with a grain of rice.” Long-grain rice, maybe.


 
More from PopPhoto.com:
Become a fan of PopPhoto.com on Facebook
Follow PopPhoto.com on Twitter
 

Change your preferences | Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Forward this email
Add newsletter@email.popphoto.com to your address book to ensure our emails reach your inbox.
Copyright © Bonnier Corporation, 460 N. Orlando Ave., Suite 200, Winter Park, FL 32789

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are those of the sponsors and are not an endorsement nor do they reflect the opinions of Bonnier Corporation or any of its publications.

Thursday, 1 September 2011

The 28 Best Photo Gear Bargains for 2011

PopPhoto
September 01, 2011
Breaking news from America's top photo magazines
PopPhotoAmerica Photo
Stretch your gear budget as far as possible

With autumn comes a fury of new photo-product announcements - and the traditional season for bargain hunting. Our editors have scoured the marketplace to come up with the seasons best deals, ranging in street-price from $7 to $850. Some are closeout models, some are brand new, but they all give you great value for your gear-buying buck. Happy shopping.

READ MORE >>

Not only did September 11, 2001 change the world forever, it changed photography forever
A new body and four new lenses come to the NX line-up
Not ready to pull the trigger on an X100? The X10 might be more your speeds


facebook
 Be the first to hear about new stuff on PopPhoto.com by subscribing to our revamped RSS feed!
TECH SUPPORT
Scan Plan
Q. I have thousands of medium-format transparencies and an Epson Perfection 2400 flatbed scanner set up to scan them. However the scans are never sharp, no matter what. I am told that a special medium-format scanner is required to do a good job. True?

A. For starters, you could try using Adobe Photoshop’s Smart Sharpen or Unsharp Mask filters to counteract this loss of sharpness. You could also try a scanner with a higher resolution, such as Epson’s Perfection V600 Photo, with resolutions of 6400x9600, compared with the Perfection 2400’s 2400x4800.

But your problem could be more fundamental. Since flatbed scanners have a fixed focus point at the plane of the glass, there is always some loss of sharpness when scanning film. In the end, a medium-format film scanner will likely give you the best results, but good ones are expensive—well over $1,000.


 
More from PopPhoto.com:
Become a fan of PopPhoto.com on Facebook
Follow PopPhoto.com on Twitter
 

Change your preferences | Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Forward this email
Add newsletter@email.popphoto.com to your address book to ensure our emails reach your inbox.
Copyright © Bonnier Corporation, 460 N. Orlando Ave., Suite 200, Winter Park, FL 32789

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are those of the sponsors and are not an endorsement nor do they reflect the opinions of Bonnier Corporation or any of its publications.

Thursday, 25 August 2011

Tons of New Gear from: Sony, Nikon and Canon

August 25, 2011

Breaking news from America's top photo magazines

Popular Photography American Photo

Hands On: Sony Alpha A77 and A65 Translucent Mirror DSLR, Plus DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM Zoom Lens
We spent some quality time with the newest additions to Sony's Alpha line-up


New Gear: Nikon Coolpix P7100 Advanced Compact
Nikon mainly addressed functionality and usability in this version of its flagship compact

New Gear: Canon Powershot SX150 IS Compact Has Full-Manual Controls
Canon offers a slightly tweaked out version of an already very capable compact

Video: Joe McNally Talks About His Faces of Ground Zero Exhibit
We talked to the iconic photographer about the debut of his new exhibit at the Time Warner Center in NYC



Photo of the Day

See the whole gallery here. 

 Be the first to hear about new stuff on PopPhoto.com by subscribing to our revamped RSS feed!

facebook

TECH SUPPORT

Dust Barrier?

Q. I’ve noticed that lately Sony is placing more and more emphasis on Translucent Mirror Technology in its DSLR line. Do the semi-transparent mirrors seal off the main image sensor completely from the rest of the camera? If so, does this technology innovation mean that Sony DSLR shooters don’t have to worry anymore about dust getting on their image sensors when changing lenses?

A.. We spoke with a top Sony tech maven and the answer is, not really. The mirror does not hermetically seal the sensor, and the shutter remains open even with the camera turned off, so there is still potential for dust to land there. We would actually be more careful than usual when changing lenses on a Sony hybrid DSLR. The camera shoots through the mirror, so image quality depends very much on its integrity. You don’t want dust—or worse, grit—on that mirror.

Do you have Tech Support Question? Post it on our Facebook Page.


 


 
More from PopPhoto.com:
Become a fan of PopPhoto.com on Facebook
Follow PopPhoto.com on Twitter
 

Change your preferences | Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Forward this email
Add newsletter@email.popphoto.com to your address book to ensure our emails reach your inbox.
Copyright © Bonnier Corporation, 460 N. Orlando Ave., Suite 200, Winter Park, FL 32789

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are those of the sponsors and are not an endorsement nor do they reflect the opinions of Bonnier Corporation or any of its publications.